Proteomic analysis of colonic crypts from normal, multiple intestinal neoplasia andp53—null mice: A comparison with colonic polyps

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1772-1781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam R. Cole ◽  
Hong Ji ◽  
Richard J. Simpson
2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A698-A698
Author(s):  
O BACHMANN ◽  
K WUECHNER ◽  
H ROSSMANN ◽  
J LEIPZIGER ◽  
M GREGOR ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
Kristina Schwamborn ◽  
Rene Krieg ◽  
Ruth Knüchel-Clarke ◽  
Joachim Grosse ◽  
Gerhard Jakse

Planta Medica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S1-S381
Author(s):  
E Changkyun Park ◽  
SY Lee ◽  
SH Yun ◽  
WY Kim ◽  
Y Yi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert I McLachlan ◽  
Andrew N Stephens ◽  
Adam Rainczuk ◽  
Caroline Foo ◽  
Mark R Condina ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-322
Author(s):  
Rejane MATTAR ◽  
Sergio Barbosa MARQUES ◽  
Maurício Kazuyoshi MINATA ◽  
Joyce Matie Kinoshita da SILVA-ETTO ◽  
Paulo SAKAI ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Rectal bleeding is the most important symptom of intestinal neoplasia; thus, tests of occult blood detection in stools are widely used for pre neoplastic lesions and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the accuracy of OC-Sensor quantitative test (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) at cut-off 10 µg Hb/g feces (50 ng/mL) in a cohort of subjects that had to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy, and if more than one sample collected in consecutive days would improve the diagnostic accuracy of the test. METHODS: Patients (mean age 56.3±9.7 years) that underwent colonoscopy prospectively randomly received one (1-sample FIT, FIT 1) or two (2-sample FIT, FIT 2) collection tubes. They collected the stool sample before starting colonoscopy preparation. Samples were analyzed by the OC-Auto Micro 80 (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). The performance of FIT 1 and FIT 2 were compared to the colonoscopy findings. RESULTS: Among 289 patients, CRC was diagnosed in 14 (4.8%), advanced adenoma in 37 (12.8%), early adenoma in 71 (24.6%) and no abnormalities in 141 (48.8%). For FIT 1, the sensitivity for CRC was 83.3% (95%CI 36.5-99.1%), for advanced adenoma was 24% (95%CI 10.1-45.5%), with specificity of 86.9% (95%CI 77.3-92.9%). For FIT 2, the sensitivity for CRC was 75% (95%CI 35.6-95.5%), for advanced adenoma was 50% (95%CI 22.3-77.7%), with specificity of 92.9% (95%CI 82.2-97.7%). The positive likelihood ratios were 1.8 (95%CI 0.7-4.4 for FIT 1) and 7.1 (95%CI 2.4-21.4 for FIT 2) for advanced adenoma, and 6.4 (95%CI 3.3-12.3, for FIT 1) and 10.7 (95%CI 3.8-29.8, for FIT 2) for CRC. The negative likelihood ratio were 0.9 (95%CI 0.7-1, for FIT 1) and 0.5 (95%CI 0.3-0.9, for FIT 2) for advanced adenoma, and 0.2 (0.03-1.1, for FIT 1) and 0.3 (0.08-0.9, for FIT 2) for CRC. The differences between FIT 1 and FIT 2 performances were not significant. However, the comparison of the levels of hemoglobin in feces of patients of FIT 1 and FIT 2 showed that the differences between no polyp group and advanced adenoma and CRC were significant. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of OCR Sensor with 10 µg Hb/g feces cut-off was comparable to other reports and two-sample collection improved the detection rate of advanced adenoma, a pre neoplastic condition to prevent CRC incidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document